next up previous contents
Next: Creating surface brightness profiles Up: Two dimensional (2D) disk Previous: 2D: Exponential function fitting   Contents


2D: Bessel function fitting

As a galaxy is not two dimensional but three dimensional a conversion between the face-on and edge-on galaxies is required to be able to use a similar description of the radial behaviour of the surface brightness. Van der Kruit vdkruit1979 showed that to keep the value of the scalelength that is determined for a face-on galaxy, which is derived from fitting an exponential function to the surface brightness, for an edge-on galaxy a modified Bessel function of the first order is required for the conversion, changing the fitting function to

\begin{displaymath}
I (r)\ =\ I_n (r/h_n) K_1 (r/h_n)\ .
\end{displaymath} (11)

The results from the line-of-sight integration assume a infinite disk without truncation. Truncation however, is a common feature of galaxies (see Kregel et. al. 2002 and Pohlen & Trujillo 2006) which makes the resulting scalelength from the Bessel function not exactly comparable to the face-on scalelength. The exponential radial function is just a simplified case which in practice works just as well. The new two dimensional two disk function, assuming no truncation, becomes
\begin{displaymath}
I (r,z)\ =\ I_n (r/h_n) K_1 (r/h_n) e^{-z/z_n} + I_k (r/f_h h_n) K_1 (r/f_h h_n) e^{-z/f_{z} z_n}\ .
\end{displaymath} (12)

Computation times of either the exponential or the Bessel function proved to be similar, leaving us the freedom to choose either as the preferred fit function on that account.


next up previous contents
Next: Creating surface brightness profiles Up: Two dimensional (2D) disk Previous: 2D: Exponential function fitting   Contents
O.A. van den Berg 2006-09-05